Jia Yueting: China’s Disgraced Debtor or America’s Reborn Entrepreneur?

In the sprawling, hyper-competitive world of Chinese tech, few names evoke such a potent cocktail of admiration, pity, and scorn as Jia Yueting. To hundreds of millions of Chinese netizens, he is the man behind one of the country’s most spectacular corporate implosions, a figure of public ridicule permanently enshrined in the digital lexicon. They know him through a meme: “下周回国” (xià zhōu huí guó), or “I’ll be back next week.” It’s a sarcastic catchphrase, a synonym for a promise that will never be kept, born from a pledge Jia made in July 2017 when he left for the United States for what he claimed was a short business trip. He never returned.¹

In China, Jia is officially designated a “laolai” (老赖), a “discredited person” or “deadbeat debtor,” a title that places him on a public blacklist and legally bars him from luxuries like flying first class or taking high-speed trains.³ His fall from grace was absolute, a cautionary tale of hubris and financial ruin that left a trail of burned investors, from powerful tycoons to 280,000 ordinary stockholders who lost everything.⁵

Yet, across the Pacific, another Jia Yueting exists. In the United States, this same man is the founder and “Chief Product and User Ecosystem Officer” of Faraday Future (FF), an electric vehicle company listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange under the ticker “FFIE.” This American version of Jia is a resilient, forward-looking entrepreneur. He has successfully navigated the complex labyrinth of U.S. bankruptcy law, wiping his personal slate clean of billions in debt.⁶ He orchestrated a public listing via a SPAC merger that injected his company with approximately $1 billion in capital.⁷ And even today, despite years of production delays and staggering losses, his company continues to attract waves of speculative investment, with its stock price capable of exploding by thousands of percent in a matter of days.¹⁰

How can these two realities possibly coexist? How does a man whose reputation is in ashes in one global superpower manage to reinvent himself and raise billions in another? This is not merely the story of one controversial founder. It is a fascinating case study in legal and cultural arbitrage, a deep dive into the profound differences between the American and Chinese systems of capital, law, and the very meaning of reputation. To understand the Jia Yueting of today, the one courting Wall Street, we must first journey back to China and understand the man he was, the empire he built, and the spectacular way it all came crashing down.

Part I: The Rise and Implosion of the LeEco Empire: “Suffocating for a Dream”

Before he was a reviled debtor, Jia Yueting was a tech messiah. He was the charismatic visionary who famously declared he would “suffocate for his dream,” a slogan that captured the imagination of a nation caught in the heady updraft of technological optimism. His company, LeEco, was once one of China’s most valuable and exciting tech firms, a sprawling empire built on a grand, intoxicating vision. The story of its rise is as critical to understanding Jia’s paradox as the story of its fall.

From Video Pioneer to Tech Messiah

Jia Yueting’s journey began not with a bang, but with a shrewd business decision. In the early 2000s, as China’s internet video scene was taking shape, most platforms operated in a gray zone, relying on pirated content to attract users. Jia’s company, then known as LeTV (乐视网), took a different path. Starting in 2004, it began systematically and aggressively purchasing the copyrights to movies and TV shows.² This was a visionary move. While competitors were building their businesses on shaky legal ground, LeTV was assembling a massive, legitimate content library.

This strategy gave LeTV a powerful moat. When the Chinese government eventually cracked down on digital piracy, LeTV’s rivals scrambled while LeTV flourished, having already secured a treasure trove of content at relatively low prices. This legitimate foundation paved the way for its successful IPO on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange’s Growth Enterprise Market in 2010, making it the first publicly listed online video company in China.²

But Jia’s ambitions extended far beyond simply streaming videos. He wasn’t content to be China’s Netflix; he wanted to be China’s Apple, Google, and Tesla, all rolled into one. He unveiled a grand, almost mystical concept he called “生态化反” (shēng tài huà fǎn), or “Ecological Chemical Reaction.” The vision was a seamless, vertically integrated ecosystem of “Platform + Content + Terminal + Application”.² In this world, LeTV’s exclusive video content (the Platform and Content) would be watched on LeTV-branded smart TVs and LeTV smartphones (the Terminals), all running on LeTV’s own operating system and software (the Application). Eventually, this ecosystem would even include a revolutionary LeTV electric car.

This narrative was intoxicating. In a market hungry for the next big thing, Jia was selling a vision of a completely interconnected digital life, a walled garden of technology that would rival anything coming out of Silicon Valley. Investors, both large institutions and a growing army of retail stock-buyers, bought into the dream completely. LeEco’s stock price soared, reaching a peak market capitalization of over 170 billion RMB (roughly $25 billion) in 2015, and Jia Yueting was celebrated as one of China’s most brilliant and daring entrepreneurs.²

The House of Cards Collapses

Beneath the soaring rhetoric of ecological synergy, a different kind of financial engineering was taking place. The grand vision required an astronomical amount of cash, and the public stock market became Jia’s personal ATM. Starting in 2015, at the peak of LeEco’s valuation, Jia and his family began a systematic process of selling off their shares in the company. This massive cash-out, estimated to be around 10 billion RMB (approximately $1.5 billion at the time), raised alarms.⁵

To quell investor concerns, Jia made a public and legally binding promise: he would loan the proceeds from his stock sales back to the publicly listed company, interest-free, for a term of at least ten years, to fund its ambitious expansion.⁵ This pledge was crucial. It framed the stock sales not as an executive cashing in his chips, but as a clever way to finance the company’s growth without diluting other shareholders. It was a story the market accepted.

The story, however, was a fiction. In 2017, as the company teetered on the brink of collapse, LeEco was forced to issue a devastating announcement. It revealed that as of October 27 of that year, the outstanding loan balance from Jia Yueting to the company was zero.⁵ He had quietly withdrawn all the money he had promised to lend. The Beijing branch of the China Securities Regulatory Commission later issued a scathing rebuke, condemning Jia for抽回全部借款 (chōu huí quánbù jièkuǎn) — “withdrawing all the loaned funds” — at a time of extreme corporate distress, an act it called a severe betrayal of public trust that had a “vicious social impact”.⁵

The cash crunch triggered a domino effect, revealing that the entire LeEco empire was a house of cards. The collapse was swift and brutal, leaving a trail of high-profile victims.

• Sun Hongbin, the pugnacious chairman of property giant Sunac China, played the role of a “white knight,” investing a staggering 15 billion RMB (over $2.2 billion) in early 2017 in a desperate bid to save the company. He was left holding the bag when Jia fled to the U.S. just months later, famously lamenting his failed investment with tears in his eyes at a press conference.⁵
• Evergrande, another Chinese real estate behemoth, became the next major casualty. In 2018, it invested $800 million into Jia’s U.S.-based car venture, Faraday Future. The money was burned through in a matter of months, leading to a bitter and public falling out between Jia and Evergrande’s chairman, Hui Ka Yan, over control and further funding.¹²
• A-List Celebrities and Retail Investors: Jia’s wife at the time, the actress Gan Wei, had leveraged her connections to bring a stable of celebrity investors into LeEco’s film production arm, including famous director Zhang Yimou and actor Sun Honglei. They, along with over 280,000 small-time retail stockholders, were effectively wiped out as LeEco’s stock plummeted 96% from its peak before being ignominiously delisted from the stock exchange.²

The ultimate catalyst for this catastrophic implosion was the very dream that was supposed to be the ecosystem’s crown jewel: the electric car. The Faraday Future project, based in California, was an insatiable black hole for capital. Building a car company from scratch is one of the most cash-intensive endeavors imaginable. One advisor had reportedly warned Jia that his automotive dream would require $25 billion, a figure Jia laughed off as absurd.¹² The billions siphoned from the Chinese operations to fund the American car dream ultimately starved the entire ecosystem of oxygen, leading to the final, fatal cash crunch that brought the whole empire down.²

The narrative Jia had sold was that of a beautiful, self-sustaining ecosystem. The reality was a fragile construct where capital was being extracted from the profitable parts to fund a wildly ambitious, cash-burning venture, all while the founder was cashing out personally. The dream he was suffocating for was not the one investors had bought into.

---

Table 1: Jia Yueting’s Business Timeline: A Tale of Two Halves

The LeEco Era (China)	The FF Era (USA)
2004: LeTV founded, begins acquiring video copyrights. 2	July 2017: Jia departs for the U.S., promising to return in two weeks. 2
2010: LeTV successfully lists on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. 2	Dec 2017: Jia is placed on China’s “discredited persons” list. 3
2013: LeEco announces its “Platform+Content+Terminal+Application” ecosystem strategy. 2	June 2018: Evergrande invests $800 million in FF, a partnership that later collapses. 12
2014: The “SEE Plan” to build a super electric car (Faraday Future) is announced. 2	Oct 2019: Jia files for Chapter 11 personal bankruptcy in the United States. 14
2015: LeEco’s market cap peaks at over 170 billion RMB. Jia begins large-scale stock sales. 2	July 2020: U.S. court approves his personal bankruptcy reorganization plan. 15
Nov 2016: Jia admits to a cash crunch in an internal letter, marking the beginning of the end. 2	Jan 2021: FF announces its plan to go public via a merger with SPAC PSAC. 7
Jan 2017: Sunac’s Sun Hongbin invests 15 billion RMB in a bailout attempt. 2	July 2021: Faraday Future (FFIE) officially lists on the Nasdaq, raising ~$1 billion. 8
July 2017: Jia resigns from all positions at LeEco. 2	Aug 2023: FF delivers its first FF 91 2.0 Futurist Alliance vehicle. 11
May 2020: LeEco is officially delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. 2	May 2024: FFIE stock experiences a massive “meme stock” surge. 10

---

Part II: The American Reinvention: A Masterclass in Legal and Financial Arbitrage

Jia Yueting’s story did not end with the collapse of LeEco. Instead, it entered a new, even more confounding chapter. His flight to California in July 2017 was not the end of his career but the beginning of a remarkable reinvention. He managed this by masterfully exploiting the vast chasm between the Chinese and American legal and financial systems, effectively arbitraging his reputation by moving from a market where it was worthless to one where it was, for all practical purposes, irrelevant.

An Exit, Not an Escape, and the “Laolai” Across the Pacific

When Jia left for California, he became a fugitive in the court of Chinese public opinion. His failure to return, despite repeated public orders from Chinese securities regulators, cemented his status as a “laolai”.² It’s a term that requires some explanation for an American audience. Being on the “List of Discredited Persons” (失信被执行人名单) is not just a bad credit score. It is a form of public shaming and a tool of social and economic control. Individuals on this list, which includes Jia multiple times over, are restricted from a range of activities deemed “high consumption”.⁴ They cannot purchase plane tickets or first-class train seats, stay in star-rated hotels, or even enroll their children in expensive private schools.³ It is a system designed to make life so inconvenient for debtors that they are forced to honor their obligations.

Herein lies the first key to Jia’s American comeback: this system stops at the border. While he is a pariah in China, his “laolai” status has absolutely no legal or financial bearing in the United States.¹⁶ His Chinese credit history is not part of his American record. The restrictions on his lifestyle do not apply. This jurisdictional firewall was the foundational element of his survival. He had moved to a new game board where his past sins were not recognized by the rulebook.

The Great Debt Reset: Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

With the immediate pressure of his Chinese creditors neutralized by geography, Jia turned to a powerful tool offered by the American legal system to handle his mountain of personal debt. In October 2019, he voluntarily filed for personal bankruptcy protection in a U.S. court.¹⁴ Crucially, he did not file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which would have meant liquidating all his assets to pay off creditors. Instead, he filed for Chapter 11, a reorganization that allows a debtor to propose a plan to restructure their finances and repay creditors over time.¹⁴

His plan was a stroke of strategic genius. He proposed to transfer all of his personal assets, most notably his entire stake in Faraday Future, into a creditor trust.¹⁵ In essence, this was a massive debt-for-equity swap. His hundreds of creditors, to whom he owed an estimated $3.6 billion, would become the beneficiaries of this trust.¹⁸ Their only path to getting their money back was no longer to sue Jia personally, but to wait for Faraday Future to become successful, go public, and generate value for its stock, which the trust now held.¹⁵

This maneuver achieved several goals simultaneously. First, it effectively co-opted his creditors. Instead of being his adversaries, their financial interests were now directly aligned with his. Their best hope for repayment was for him to succeed in building FF. Second, it provided him with a powerful new narrative. In a public letter in July 2020, upon the court’s approval of his plan, he announced that he no longer owned any FF stock.²¹ He had, he claimed, transformed from an entrepreneur into a “打工仔” (dǎ gōng zǎi) — a mere “worker” or “wage earner” — whose sole mission was to work for his creditors and make them whole.¹⁵ It was a brilliant piece of public relations that reframed him from a runaway debtor into a dedicated founder on a noble quest for redemption.

The process culminated in March 2021, when a U.S. federal bankruptcy court issued an “Order of Discharge”.⁶ This legal order officially and permanently wiped his slate clean. Under the U.S. legal system, all of his personal debts incurred before that date were forgiven. Jia Yueting was, in the eyes of American law, a man free from his past financial obligations.⁶

The SPAC Shortcut to Wall Street

With his personal debt issues legally resolved, Jia turned to the next challenge: funding his capital-starved car company. Here again, he found a perfectly suited vehicle in the American financial markets: the SPAC.

A Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) is essentially a publicly-traded shell company. It raises money from investors in an IPO with the sole purpose of finding a private company to merge with, thereby taking that private company public.²² For a company like Faraday Future, this “backdoor listing” method offered several advantages over a traditional IPO. It was faster, required less onerous regulatory scrutiny, and, most importantly, came with a powerful legal shield.²²

In January 2021, FF announced it would merge with a SPAC named Property Solutions Acquisition Corp. (PSAC).⁷ The deal, which closed in July 2021, provided Faraday Future with approximately $1 billion in fresh capital and a coveted listing on the Nasdaq.⁸

Critically, the SPAC structure allowed FF to operate under a legal “safe harbor” provision for forward-looking statements.²³ In a traditional IPO, companies are heavily restricted in making financial projections for fear of investor lawsuits if they miss their targets. The safe harbor rule, however, gives companies merging with SPACs more leeway to “tell the company’s story” and paint a rosy picture of the future. This was perfect for a pre-revenue company like FF. It allowed Jia and his team to market a vision—projecting sales of over 400,000 vehicles in the next five years, for example—with a significantly lower risk of legal blowback when those ambitious targets were inevitably missed.⁷ The SPAC wasn’t just a fundraising tool; it was a legally protected mechanism for selling a dream.

Through this three-step process—leveraging the jurisdictional firewall, resetting his debt via Chapter 11, and accessing capital via a SPAC—Jia Yueting had completed his American reinvention. He had used the rules of the U.S. system to neutralize his past, realign his adversaries, and fund his future.

Part III: The Allure of Faraday Future: Why Does the Money Keep Flowing?

Even with a clean legal slate and a Nasdaq listing, the central question remains: why do investors continue to bet on a company led by a founder with such a checkered past? The answer is not singular but a complex mix of a compelling product promise, a speculative market frenzy, shrewd geopolitical positioning, and the undeniable salesmanship of Jia Yueting himself.

The Product as a Perpetual Promise

From its splashy debut in 2017, the Faraday Future FF 91 has never been positioned as just another electric car. It is marketed as a new species of vehicle, an “Ultimate AI Tech Luxury” machine that exists in a category of its own, far above Tesla and aimed squarely at the likes of Bentley, Maybach, and Rolls-Royce.²⁰

The promises are breathtaking. The car boasts a tri-motor powertrain generating 1,050 horsepower, a 0-60 mph time of under 2.3 seconds, and an industry-leading battery pack.²⁴ Its interior features a “zero-gravity” rear seat inspired by NASA spacecraft and a suite of screens powered by advanced AI. To back these claims, FF points to a portfolio of nearly 900 approved and pending utility and design patents globally, covering everything from its powertrain inverters to its unique chassis architecture.⁹ The FF 91 is a narrative of technological supremacy.

The reality, however, has been a story of perpetual delay. The promise of mass production has been a moving target for years, with deadlines missed in 2019, 2020, and beyond.²⁷ The car that seemed revolutionary in 2017 is only now being delivered in minuscule quantities. In the intervening years, the EV market has exploded. Many of the FF 91’s once-unique features have been matched or even surpassed by a host of competitors, particularly the wave of high-tech luxury EVs emerging from China’s own fiercely competitive market.²⁷ The product remains a tantalizing promise, but one whose luster has been dulled by time and the relentless pace of innovation elsewhere.

A Market Hungry for Hype and the “Meme Stock” Phenomenon

Faraday Future’s public listing in mid-2021 was perfectly timed to ride a massive wave of investor enthusiasm for all things EV. During this period, valuations across the sector often became detached from fundamentals like revenue or production, driven instead by hype and the fear of missing out on the next Tesla.⁸

More recently, FF’s stock has become a prime example of an even more bizarre market dynamic: the “meme stock” phenomenon. In May 2024, the stock, which had been languishing below $0.10 and facing delisting from the Nasdaq, suddenly erupted. In a matter of days, its price surged by over 3,000%, triggering dozens of trading halts due to extreme volatility.¹⁰

This behavior has little to do with the company’s actual performance. FF itself has stated in financial filings that it “may never be able to achieve or sustain profitability” and has delivered only a handful of cars to date.¹¹ Instead, the surge was driven by a horde of retail investors, often coordinating on social media platforms, who were attracted by the stock’s narrative and its high “short interest.” Data showed that a massive percentage of FF’s publicly available shares had been borrowed and sold short by hedge funds betting the price would go down.³⁰ This made it a perfect target for a “short squeeze,” where a rising price forces short-sellers to buy back shares to cover their losses, which in turn pushes the price even higher. For these investors, buying FFIE stock is less a long-term investment in a car company and more a bet on a volatile, high-risk, high-reward trading event—a lottery ticket, not a blue-chip stock.

The Geopolitical Gambit and Strategic Investors

Beyond the retail frenzy, there is a more calculated, strategic investment thesis at play. A look at FF’s list of backers and partners reveals the involvement of major Chinese players, including automotive giant Geely and state-backed investment funds from cities like Zhuhai and Huanggang.⁷

For these sophisticated investors, FF may represent a unique “East-West bridge.” It is a company with American roots, a U.S. headquarters, and a Nasdaq listing, but its founder and many of its supply chain connections are deeply Chinese. This hybrid identity could prove to be a valuable asset in an era of escalating U.S.-China trade tensions.

This theory gained significant traction with the recent U.S. announcement of a 100% tariff on Chinese-made EVs. Suddenly, FF’s positioning looks prescient. Jia himself has seized on this, arguing that FF can serve as a bridge to bring China’s mature and cost-effective EV supply chain to the U.S. market without being subject to the crippling tariffs that would hit a car fully assembled in China.¹⁰ For a strategic investor, a bet on FF might not just be a bet on a luxury car, but a clever geopolitical hedge against a fractured global trade environment.

The Indomitable Salesman

Finally, one cannot discount the central figure in this entire saga: Jia Yueting himself. Despite his history of broken promises and financial ruin, his ability to craft a compelling vision and sell a dream remains undeniably potent. Anecdotes from former employees paint a picture of a charismatic and intensely dedicated leader, a “good boss” who works tirelessly and remembers the names of his staff.¹⁵ He has survived corporate death, public disgrace, and personal bankruptcy, yet he persists. Investors are not just betting on a car or a stock; they are betting on Jia’s almost supernatural resilience and his unwavering belief that he can pull off the impossible one more time.

---

Table 2: The Two Sides of the Ledger: Debts in China vs. Funding in America

The LeEco Debt Pile (China)	The FF Fundraising Machine (USA)
Sunac China (Sun Hongbin): Burned for over 15 billion RMB ($2.2B) in a failed bailout. 5	SPAC Merger (2021): Raised approximately $1 billion in gross proceeds. 7
Evergrande Group: Lost its $800 million investment in FF after a bitter dispute. 12	PIPE Investment: Secured $775 million from institutional investors as part of the SPAC deal. 7
Chinese Creditors: Jia’s personal bankruptcy filing listed an estimated $3.6 billion in claims. 18	Geely Holding Group: Participated as a key strategic partner and investor. 31
280,000+ Retail Investors: Wiped out when LeEco’s stock was delisted. 5	Chinese Municipal Funds: Secured investment and partnership agreements with cities like Zhuhai and Huanggang. 7
Countless Suppliers: Left with billions in unpaid bills from the LeEco collapse. 13	Recent Meme Stock Surge: Market cap temporarily surged, creating potential for new financing opportunities. 11

---

Conclusion: A Bet on a Dream, Backed by Legal Loopholes

The paradox of Jia Yueting—the simultaneous existence of the disgraced Chinese debtor and the resilient American entrepreneur—is not the result of any single factor. It is the product of a perfect storm, a confluence of systems, timing, and personal tenacity.

First, a jurisdictional firewall allowed him to step outside the reach of a Chinese justice and social credit system that had blacklisted him, entering an American system where his past transgressions carried no legal weight.

Second, he masterfully wielded powerful American legal tools. Chapter 11 bankruptcy was not an admission of failure but a strategic masterstroke to neutralize his debts and convert his adversaries into allies. The SPAC merger was not just a path to capital but a legally sheltered vehicle for selling a futuristic, and as-yet-unproven, narrative.

Third, he emerged into a market environment uniquely receptive to his story. An EV-obsessed market hungry for the next big thing, followed by a “meme stock” mania that prizes speculative narratives and volatility over proven fundamentals, provided fertile ground for FF’s stock.

Fourth, a shifting geopolitical landscape has lent his company an unexpected strategic allure. In an era of trade wars and tariffs, his “East-West bridge” concept has transformed from a marketing slogan into a potentially viable, if speculative, investment thesis.

Finally, there is Jia’s own unyielding salesmanship. He is a man who has proven, time and again, his ability to sell a compelling dream, even when the foundations of his last dream have crumbled into dust.

Jia Yueting has, without question, successfully played the American game of high-risk capital and procedural law. But while the stock charts gyrate and the fundraising announcements provide fleeting moments of validation, the ultimate verdict on his reinvention has yet to be written. That verdict will not be delivered by a court or a stock market, but by the humming of assembly lines at his factory in Hanford, California. Only when thousands of FF 91s are rolling off those lines and into the hands of paying customers will we know the final answer. Is Jia Yueting a phoenix, brilliantly reborn from the ashes of his past? Or is he a phantom, a master illusionist who managed to sell a ghost story to the most sophisticated financial market in the world? For now, the world, and his many investors, are still waiting.

Works cited

1. 贾跃亭：从“下周回国”到“下周做主播”？-观察者网, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.guancha.cn/qiche/2024_05_08_734049.shtml
2. 乐视视频- 维基百科，自由的百科全书 – Wikipedia, accessed June 16, 2025, https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-cn/%E4%B9%90%E8%A7%86%E8%A7%86%E9%A2%91
3. 新华社连发三文批乐视：不排除强制令贾跃亭回国-观察者网, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.guancha.cn/economy/2017_12_31_441311.shtml
4. 失信人名单近1300万例，贾跃亭与戴威的区别在哪里 – 第一财经, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.yicai.com/news/100100754.html
5. 贾跃亭，你造的车中国人不敢买_36氪, accessed June 16, 2025, https://auto-time.36kr.com/p/738091934835840
6. 拆解贾跃亭的债权人信托对我国个人破产制度有何借鉴？ – 21世纪经济报道, accessed June 16, 2025, https://m.21jingji.com/article/20240509/3daa18066b59f8d61c262e8c03e42d5e_zaker.html
7. FF曲线上市融资10亿美金：为什么还有人相信贾跃亭？ – 未来汽车日报, accessed June 16, 2025, https://auto-time.36kr.com/p/1075045988183937
8. 「下周回国」四年已过，「今晚敲钟」贾跃亭 – 未来汽车日报, accessed June 16, 2025, https://auto-time.36kr.com/p/1321919214176772
9. Faraday Future将通过与Property Solutions Acquisition Corp. 合并在美国纳斯达克证券交易所上市，共募集资金约10亿美金, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.faradayfuturecn.com/cn/press-room/FF-to-list-through-merger-with-PSAC/
10. 短短几天法拉第未来股价暴涨数十倍，贾跃亭的逆转要来了？ – 银柿财经, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.yinsfinance.com/article/1340633.shtml
11. 贾跃亭“FF上市资格保卫战”首战告捷法拉第未来股价3天最高涨21倍 – 东方财富, accessed June 16, 2025, https://wap.eastmoney.com/a/202405163078562846.html
12. 贾跃亭的FF刚拿了916万美元，推出B2B业务做供应商，量产彻底凉了？ – 未来汽车日报, accessed June 16, 2025, http://auto-time.36kr.com/p/674336892023817
13. “下周回国”的贾跃亭又又又又要“回来”了还有人愿意相信他吗？ – 盖世汽车, accessed June 16, 2025, https://auto.gasgoo.com/news/202007/13I70196393C108.shtml
14. 贾跃亭的破产疑云 – 中国经济网, accessed June 16, 2025, http://www.ce.cn/cysc/tech/gd2012/201910/14/t20191014_33330914.shtml
15. 贾跃亭：你看我还有机会吗？ – 未来汽车日报, accessed June 16, 2025, https://auto-time.36kr.com/p/786393678934659
16. 律师：贾跃亭失信，或难影响其在美融资 – 第一财经, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.yicai.com/news/5387300.html
17. 贾跃亭还没回国，他的公司先回国了-钛媒体官方网站, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.tmtpost.com/6386098.html
18. 贾跃亭前20大债权人详解：英大资本索赔2.79亿美元居首-观察者网, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.guancha.cn/qiche/2019_10_16_521474.shtml
19. 贾跃亭破产重整：情怀至上还是缓兵之计？ – 中国网财经, accessed June 16, 2025, http://m.gxfin.com/article/finance/cj/renwu/2020-06-19/5300146.html
20. 独家专访|FF全球CEO：上市后兑现量产承诺，未来两年FF91销量将达4万台, accessed June 16, 2025, https://m.yicai.com/news/101118410.html
21. 贾跃亭公开致歉：个人破产重组完成将补偿乐视网股民 – 东方财富, accessed June 16, 2025, https://finance.eastmoney.com/news/1354,202007021540274166.html
22. 法拉第未来被曝筹划在美“借壳上市” 推动FF91量产 – 东方财富, accessed June 16, 2025, https://finance.eastmoney.com/a/202010061655804716.html
23. 贾跃亭PPT 的威力，美国人终于见识了_36氪, accessed June 16, 2025, https://auto-time.36kr.com/p/1788722044990084
24. FF联手美国豪宅圈、名人圈、豪车圈首批塔尖用户开启车主开发者共创计划携手推进“极智科技顶奢”出行变革, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.faradayfuturecn.com/cn/press-room/FF-launches-the-FF91-owner-developer-cocreation-plan/
25. 新势力当道，FF91有竞争力吗？ – 华尔街见闻, accessed June 16, 2025, https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3636161
26. FF91将在纽约面世，时间待定，57页PPT终成真？_汽车 – 企业观察网, accessed June 16, 2025, https://m.cneo.com.cn/portal.php?mod=view&aid=7788&mobile=2
27. 为梦想窒息9年，法拉第未来要来了，这你受得了吗？ – 盖世汽车- Gasgoo, accessed June 16, 2025, https://auto.gasgoo.com/news/202306/1I70343627C107.shtml
28. FF股价走势一路下滑，贾跃亭“画饼”应运而生，投资者还会买账吗？ – OFweek锂电网, accessed June 16, 2025, https://libattery.ofweek.com/2021-09/ART-36008-8500-30526731_2.html
29. 法拉第未来1.45 0.00(0.00%) – 腾讯证券, accessed June 16, 2025, https://gu.qq.com/usFFIE.OQ/gg/news
30. 散户能救贾跃亭？法拉第未来一夜暴涨367% – 证券时报, accessed June 16, 2025, https://www.stcn.com/article/detail/1205602.html
31. 传FF将与SPAC合并上市，吉利或为其投资超7亿美元 – 盖世汽车- Gasgoo, accessed June 16, 2025, https://auto.gasgoo.com/news/202101/28I70240321C501.shtml
32. 珠海投资、吉利投资、纳斯达克募资，法拉第未来不愁钱了愁什么？ – 盖世汽车, accessed June 16, 2025, https://auto.gasgoo.com/news/202101/30I70240561C109.shtml