Who is Zhang Xuefeng

In the vibrant landscape of China’s education sector, Zhang Xuefeng stands out as a prominent figure who has captured the public’s imagination and ignited spirited debates. Born in 1984, Zhang, whose real name is Zhang Zibiao, has carved a niche for himself as an influential educator and online personality. His rise to fame began with a viral video in 2016 titled “Seven Minutes to Explain 34 Top Universities,” which catapulted him into the limelight. Since then, Zhang has become synonymous with his candid and often controversial insights into the Chinese educational system, particularly in the context of postgraduate entrance exams.

Recently, Zhang’s comments on the value of liberal arts majors, specifically journalism, have sparked a firestorm of controversy. During a livestream, he made the provocative claim that he would “beat the living daylights out of his child” if they chose to study journalism, arguing that any other major would be a better choice. His remarks, characterized by a blunt pragmatism, have resonated with many, while others have taken offense, leading to a heated debate that transcends the realm of academia and spills into the public sphere.

This blog post aims to delve into the heart of this controversy, examining Zhang Xuefeng’s background, the nature of his controversial statements, and the broader discussions they have sparked about the role and value of liberal arts education in contemporary China.

Zhang Xuefeng’s Rise to Fame

Zhang Xuefeng, born Zhang Zibiao, embarked on an unconventional path to stardom within China’s educational landscape. Born in 1984, Zhang’s journey began with a background in civil engineering, a field he studied at university. However, his career took a dramatic turn when he transitioned into the realm of education, specifically focusing on postgraduate entrance exams. This shift was not without its challenges, as Zhang had to navigate the complexities of a new industry and establish himself as an authority in a field dominated by established educators and institutions.

The pivotal moment in Zhang’s career came in 2016 when he released a video titled “Seven Minutes to Explain 34 Top Universities.” This video, which showcased his ability to distill complex information into digestible and engaging content, went viral, catapulting him into the spotlight. Zhang’s straightforward and often blunt approach to discussing the realities of China’s competitive educational system resonated with a wide audience, particularly students and parents grappling with the pressures of higher education.

Despite his initial reluctance to enter the entertainment industry, Zhang’s charismatic personality and unapologetic style quickly garnered him a significant following. His celebrity status grew as he began to participate in prominent TV shows, further expanding his influence beyond the digital realm. However, it was his continued focus on postgraduate education that solidified his position as a thought leader in the field.

Zhang Xuefeng’s rise to fame was not without controversy. His critiques of higher education institutions and his unfiltered opinions on the value of certain majors have often sparked heated debates. His willingness to speak his mind, even when it meant clashing with established norms, has been both his strength and the source of his notoriety. His comments, particularly those regarding journalism and liberal arts majors, have been met with both support and criticism, reflecting the deep-seated tensions within China’s educational system.

Zhang Xuefeng’s Controversial Remarks and Public Reactions

Zhang Xuefeng’s bold statements about journalism and liberal arts majors have sparked a wave of controversy and debate. During a livestream, he made the provocative claim that he would “beat the living daylights out of his child” if they chose to study journalism, arguing that any other major would be a better choice. He further characterized the service industry with the Chinese character “tian,” which translates to “lick” in English, often associated with flattery or pleasing others without principle. These comments, reported by Chongqing-based news portal Shangyou News, trended on the microblogging site Sina Weibo with over 200 million views, reflecting the widespread attention and polarized reactions they received.

The public’s response to Zhang’s remarks was varied, with some agreeing with his pragmatic view that journalism and liberal arts majors may not lead to high-paying jobs or stable careers in the current job market. These supporters often cited the rise of self-media and the saturation of the journalism field as reasons for his stance. They appreciated Zhang’s candid approach, which they saw as a refreshing departure from the sugar-coated advice often given to students.

On the other hand, many in the academic community and those who value the liberal arts were outraged by Zhang’s comments. They argued that his remarks were not only disrespectful but also reflected a narrow understanding of the value of liberal arts education. Critics pointed out that the humanities provide essential skills such as critical thinking, communication, and ethical reasoning, which are vital in any profession. They also highlighted the importance of diverse perspectives and the role of journalism in a democratic society.

The controversy also sparked a broader discussion about the role of education in preparing students for the future. Some questioned whether the current educational system in China is too focused on practical outcomes and marketability, neglecting the development of well-rounded individuals and the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake. Others defended the emphasis on STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) subjects, arguing that they offer more tangible career prospects and contribute to the country’s technological advancement.

The debate also touched on the issue of social mobility and the pressure on students from less privileged backgrounds to choose majors that guarantee high-paying jobs. Zhang’s comments were seen by some as a reflection of the harsh realities faced by these students, who may not have the luxury of pursuing their passions if they cannot secure stable employment.

In response to the backlash, Zhang issued a public apology on Weibo, acknowledging the hurt his comments may have caused. However, the controversy has not abated, and it continues to fuel discussions about the value of different academic disciplines and the role of educators in guiding students’ career choices.

The controversy surrounding Zhang Xuefeng’s comments has underscored the complexities of China’s educational landscape and the societal expectations placed on students. It has also highlighted the need for a more nuanced conversation about the purpose of education, the value of liberal arts, and the role of influencers in shaping public opinion.

---

The controversy stirred by Zhang Xuefeng’s remarks serves as a microcosm of the broader societal debates on education and its role in shaping the future of individuals and societies. His comments, while controversial, have sparked important conversations about the value of liberal arts in a rapidly evolving world and the expectations placed on students, particularly those from less privileged backgrounds.

In a society where practicality and economic outcomes often take precedence, Zhang’s statements resonate with those who believe in the necessity of preparing students for the realities of the job market. However, they also challenge the traditional view that education should foster a well-rounded individual, capable of critical thinking, ethical decision-making, and cultural appreciation.

The public’s varied reactions to Zhang’s comments reflect the deep-seated tensions between these perspectives. While some see his words as a harsh but necessary reality check, others view them as a dismissal of the intrinsic value of liberal arts and the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake.

It is crucial to recognize that education is not a one-size-fits-all endeavor. Different cultures and societies value different aspects of learning, and what may be considered a practical choice in one context may not hold the same weight in another. The diversity of educational paths should be celebrated, as it allows individuals to explore their passions, contribute to society in unique ways, and fosters a rich tapestry of ideas and perspectives.

In the global village we live in today, understanding and respecting the diversity of educational systems and philosophies is more important than ever. It is through this understanding that we can bridge cultural divides, promote mutual respect, and work towards a more inclusive and equitable world.

As we navigate the complexities of the 21st century, it is essential to remember that the purpose of education extends beyond immediate job prospects. It is about equipping individuals with the skills and knowledge to navigate life’s challenges, contribute to their communities, and engage in meaningful work that aligns with their values and aspirations.

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Zhang Xuefeng’s comments serves as a reminder of the need for a balanced and nuanced approach to education. It is through this balance that we can foster a society that values both the practical and the profound, the tangible and the intangible, and the diversity of paths that lead to personal fulfillment and societal progress.